The Social Security Administration (SSA) recently revised four sections of the Program Operations Manual System (POMS). The POMS is a primary source of information used by Social Security employees to process claims for Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits. Most of the changes to the POMS sections were administrative in nature. However, the changes to POMS Section 1120.201 were substantive and may upend countless first-party special needs trusts (SNT) that the SSA previously approved.
The revised POMS Section 1120.201 contains an example in sub-paragraph F that rejects any first-party SNT containing provisions allowing payments that enable family members to visit the disabled trust beneficiary. In the example used in the POMS section, the “trust document includes a provision permitting the trustee to use trust funds in order to pay for the SSI recipients family to fly from Idaho and visit him in Nebraska.” The SSA states that “[t]he trust is not established for the sole benefit of the trust beneficiary, since it permits the trustee to use trust funds in a manner that will financially benefit the SSI recipients family.” Since many special needs trusts contain broadly-worded provisions like those quoted above which permit trust funds to be used to pay for friends or family members to accompany the primary beneficiary on vacation or to special events, or to visit the trust beneficiary, the revised POMS section may affect the validity of many existing SNTs.
In addition to rejecting any first-party SNTs containing provisions allowing payments that enable family members to visit the trust beneficiary, SSA is apparently also going to require that any SNT authorizing payment to caregivers contain language limiting such payments to caregivers who are medically certified, medically trained or approved to provide care. SSA is reportedly reviewing old SNTs to ensure compliance with the new regulations when the beneficiary comes up for re-certification.
In my opinion, this revision to the POMS regulations is going to have a profound impact on many beneficiaries of SNTs. Many of the care services paid for by SNTs are for non-professional services, such as shopping, cleaning, and related “non-medical” care services, which can be obtained at low cost. If a medical professional now must be hired to perform these non-professional services, the increase in cost may bankrupt many SNTS, resulting in the possible institutionalization of the SNT beneficiaries at a much higher cost to the State.
(My thanks to the Academy of Special Needs Planners website and listserv for information used in this blog post.)
Categories
- Affordable Care Act
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Arbitration
- Attorney Ethics
- Attorneys Fees
- Beneficiary Designations
- Blog Roundup and Highlights
- Blogs and Blogging
- Care Facilities
- Caregivers
- Cemetery
- Collaborative Family Law
- Conservatorships
- Consumer Fraud
- Contempt
- Contracts
- Defamation
- Developmental Disabilities
- Discovery
- Discrimination Laws
- Doctrine of Probable Intent
- Domestic Violence
- Elder Abuse
- Elder Law
- Elective Share
- End-of-Life Decisions
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Estate Planning
- Events
- Family Law
- Fiduciary
- Financial Exploitation of the Elderly
- Funeral
- Future of the Legal Profession
- Geriatric Care Managers
- Governmental or Public Benefit Programs
- Guardianship
- Health Issues
- Housing for the Elderly and Disabled
- In Remembrance
- Insolvent Estates
- Institutional Liens
- Insurance
- Interesting New Cases
- Intestacy
- Law Firm News
- Law Firm Videos
- Law Practice Management / Development
- Lawyers and Lawyering
- Legal Capacity or Competancy
- Legal Malpractice
- Legal Rights of the Disabled
- Liens
- Litigation
- Mediation
- Medicaid Appeals
- Medicaid Applications
- Medicaid Planning
- Annuities
- Care Contracts
- Divorce
- Estate Recovery
- Family Part Non-Dissolution Support Orders
- Gifts
- Life Estates
- Loan repayments
- MMMNA
- Promissory Notes
- Qualified Income Trusts
- Spousal Refusal
- Transfers For Reasons Other Than To Qualify For Medicaid
- Transfers to "Caregiver" Child(ren)
- Transfers to Disabled Adult Children
- Trusts
- Undue Hardship Provision
- Multiple-Party Deposit Account Act
- New Cases
- New Laws
- News Briefs
- Newsletters
- Non-Probate Assets
- Nursing Facility Litigation
- Personal Achievements and Awards
- Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Probate
- Punitive Damages
- Reconsideration
- Retirement Benefits
- Reverse Mortgages
- Section 8 Housing
- Settlement of Litigation
- Social Media
- Special Education
- Special Needs Planning
- Surrogate Decision-Making
- Taxation
- Technology
- Texting
- Top Ten
- Trials
- Trustees
- Uncategorized
- Veterans Benefits
- Web Sites and the Internet
- Webinar
- Writing Intended To Be A Will
Vanarelli & Li, LLC on Social Media